Leaving Behind Care For Pets

May 18th, 2012

It was an honor to be mentioned in Becky Yerak’s fabulous article on Estate Planning for Pets featured in The Chicago Tribune’s front page on May 14, 2012.  A special thank you to my clients, The Friedman Family, for their participation.

Download “Leaving Behind Care For Pets

chicago-tribune-may-14-2012-pet-trust-article-lindsey-markusA trust set up by Jennifer Ranville, right, and her husband calls for their dogs George, left, and Brandon to stay with their children — Sloane, 2, from left, Brady, 4, and Eden, 7 months — if the parents die. “At least they would still have their dogs,” says Ranville, of Gilberts.

The Shoemaker’s Shoes

May 8th, 2012

By Lindsey Markus, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin

We are all familiar with the old adage of the shoemaker whose son walks around barefoot. The legal arena is not the only practice plagued by this adage - but it may be time to say “enough!”

Estate planning is guided by the three following principles: (1) Minimizing estate tax consequences, (2) Avoiding probate (3) Increasing asset protection.

Download “Certain Principles Guide A Person During Estate Planning”

(continued on page 2 below…)

chicago-daily-law-bulletin-41612_page_11

chicago-daily-law-bulletin-41612_page_22

Women Helping Women partners with American Red Cross Teddy Bear Program

May 7th, 2012
photo-33

A Very Successful Event!
Apr 3, 2012

When a house fire or other disaster occurs, emergency vehicles rush to the scene with sirens blaring and lights flashing. People rush around frantically. Some might be shouting, others crying. In a heartbeat, an entire home can be lost.

During these moments of vulnerability and despair, the American Red Cross of Greater Chicago steps in, providing assistance for immediate needs, such as food, shelter and clothing.  The organization also gives comfort to the youngest of those affected by disasters—providing teddy bears to children who experience trauma. Although giving a teddy bear cannot reverse the disasters that occur, it can help make difficult times a bit more bearable, especially for children.

This April’s Women Helping Women event, an after-hours networking group that integrates business development with philanthropy, will support Chicago-area children who are affected by disaster and served by the American Red Cross Teddy Bear Program.

WHW Mix-and-Mingles are biannual wine and hors d’oeuvres gatherings hosted by the women attorneys of Chuhak & Tecson, P.C.  Mix-and-Mingles offer women entrepreneurs, decision makers and potential strategic partners the opportunity to streamline their schedules by networking, developing business and serving the community, all at the same event.

Service projects that benefit women and their children are a hallmark of WHW, and a different non-profit organization is highlighted at each event. Attendees of the April 26 event are asked to donate new teddy bears to the American Red Cross.

Lindsey Markus, a Chuhak & Tecson principal who will give opening remarks at the event, is thrilled that WHW is partnering with the Red Cross.

“When I first learned of the Red Cross Teddy Bear Program, I simply smiled,” Markus said. “The Teddy Bear Program provides an opportunity for us to bring comfort and hopefully a smile to children who have lost their homes due to natural disasters.”

Fran Edwardson, CEO of the American Red Cross of Greater Chicago, said the organization relies on partners such as Women Helping Women to help fund its teddy bear needs for Chicago-area children.

“Nearly half of the people we help in our community are children,” Edwardson said. “You should see their eyes light up when one of our volunteers hands a young disaster victim a soft stuffed animal to hug. It really brings them comfort.”

Markus believes that as more women enter into leadership roles in the workplace, they are even more empowered to make an impact with organizations like the Teddy Bear Program.

“Attendees leave our Women Helping Women events feeling tremendous satisfaction in knowing they have helped make a difference,” Markus said. “What I’m most looking forward to with this event is seeing a sea of warm, caring, intelligent women with an army of teddy bears ready to bring smiles to kids throughout our community.”

The Mix-and-Mingle will be held April 26 from 5 to 7 p.m. at Lloyd’s Chicago, located at 1 S. Wacker Dr. If you would like to receive an invitation, please contact Katie Walsh at (312) 201-3447 or kwalsh@chuhak.com.

Planned Giving Permits Larger Donations - Chicago Daily Law Bulletin

March 26th, 2012

Check out Lindsey’s recent article in the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin on Planned Giving.  This piece stemmed from a presentation Lindsey made at the JUF YLD Board “Want to Leave a Legacy Without Dramatically Impacting Your Current Cash Flow?”.  Contact Lindsey if you would be interested in a similar presentation being made to your charitable organization.

charitable-planning-march-20124

In The Spotlight on Chicago Daily Law Bulletin

March 5th, 2012

I am thrilled to be featured in the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin talking about Bubble Ball 2012 coming up this Saturday, March 10. The Bubble Ball is the signature annual fundraising gala for Between Friends, a fantastic  nonprofit that works to eradicate domestic violence by offering resources and prevention-based education to individuals and the community. http://www.bubbleball.org/lindsey-in-law-bulletin2

Retirement Plan Beneficiary Designations: The good, the bad and the ugly!

September 2nd, 2011
Individuals may often have a complex estate plan, but failure to properly address a retirement plan beneficiary designation can cause havoc. Regardless of what a client’s estate plan may say, the beneficiary designation under the client’s IRA governs. For many clients, their largest asset is their retirement plan. IRAs in particular require special attention because they are subject to both estate taxes and income taxes. Listed below is a summary of “The Good, The Bad and The Ugly” issues to be mindful of as you navigate through the complex rules that govern retirement plans and beneficiary designations.

I.  Black Letter Law for Timing of Post Mortem Distributions

Distribution of Assets when Participant dies BEFORE age 70 ½: Distributed

  • within 5 years or
  • over the life expectancy of the designated beneficiary. Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-3.

THE GOOD: If the designated beneficiary is the participant’s spouse, there is increased flexibility and the surviving spouse may roll over to his or her own IRA. Note: Where the distribution is made by reason of the death of the participant, distributions from the participant’s account to the surviving spouse under age 59½ are NOT subject to the 10 percent early distribution tax under IRC § 72(t). PLR 9418034 (February 10, 1994).

Distribution of Assets when Participant dies AFTER age 70 ½: Distributed over the longer of

  • the remaining life expectancy of the participant; or
  • the life expectancy of the designated beneficiary.  Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-5.
  • Note:  If the designated beneficiary is the participant’s spouse – increased flexibility.

II.  Definition of “Designated Beneficiary” and Trust Complications

Designated Beneficiary: Individual identified as a beneficiary of the Plan and is determined as of September 30 following the year of the participant’s death. Treas. Reg. §1.401(a)(9)-4.

  • An estate does NOT qualify
  • A charitable organization does NOT qualify
  • A living trust MAY qualify

When will a trust qualify as a “designated beneficiary?” See Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-4.

  • Trust must be valid pursuant to state law and irrevocable (upon death of participant is sufficient)
  • Only individuals may be beneficiaries and beneficiaries must be identifiable
  • By October 31 of the calendar year following the participant’s death, trustee must provide to the administrator either (i) a copy of the trust or (ii) a list of all beneficiaries of the trust

THE BAD: Unless the trust includes specific “Stretch IRA Trust” or “Conduit Trust” language and the beneficiary designations are properly updated, even if the trust is treated as a “designated beneficiary,” the OLDEST trust beneficiary is used for purposes of determining the distribution period for the minimum required distribution. Treas Reg § 1.401(a)(9)-4.

  • Look through the trust to the life expectancies of ALL beneficiaries – including contingent beneficiaries and identify the beneficiary with the shortest life expectancy (oldest beneficiary). Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A 7(c); See also PLR 200228025 (April 18, 2002).

THE UGLY: If a traditional living trust is the beneficiary…there is the potential for increased complications!

  • Marital Trust Problem: If retirement assets are used to fund the marital trust (a.k.a QTIP Trust), issues arise if a charity is an ultimate beneficiary, and excess income taxes may be incurred. The QTIP Trust may receive a required minimum distribution from the IRA that is greater than the income earned by the IRA and the income will often be taxed at the maximum federal income tax rate.
  • Credit Shelter Trust: Often the surviving spouse is the applicable measuring life for purposes of the minimum required distribution. The income tax liability associated with the minimum required distribution depletes the assets of the credit shelter trust. But, if assets are distributed to the surviving spouse, this is counter to the purpose of the credit shelter trust.
  • These issues can be avoided if (i) your existing living trust is amended to include “Stretch IRA Trust” or “Conduit Trust” language which would enable for maximum income tax planning; and (ii) your beneficiary designations are properly updated to correspond with those changes.

III.  Planning Advice

  • Generally, from a tax perspective and in an effort to ease administrative burdens, it is best to appoint an individual beneficiary (vs. a trust);  name several contingent beneficiaries so that “disclaimers” / post-mortem planning is an option.
  • If a client insists on using a trust, consider drafting a 401k trust (also known as a “Stretch IRA Trust” or a “Conduit Trust”), a trust customized to ONLY hold the retirement plan beneficiary designations and circumvent some of the traditional problems associated with naming a trust as a designated beneficiary.
  • If beneficiary designation is a living trust, include customized language that allows the trustee to accelerate the distribution to any disqualified beneficiary before the September 30 after grantor’s death, or try to have “bad beneficiaries” disclaim interest before September 30 date – not always an option.

We would be happy to discuss your particular circumstances and review your existing estate planning documents and beneficiary designations to ensure effective estate planning and income tax planning.

NEW ILLINOIS POWER OF ATTORNEY FORMS EFFECTIVE IN 2011

April 22nd, 2011

gavel-power-of-attornery-form2This summer, new Illinois statutory forms for the Power of Attorney for Property and the Power of Attorney for Health Care go into effect. On July 22, 2010, the governor signed Illinois House Bill 6477, a comprehensive update of the Illinois Power of Attorney Act. While the law was signed last year, the changes will not be effective until July 1, 2011.

Powers of Attorney are often referred to as “disability documents,” which come into effect during your lifetime in the event of incapacitation and terminate upon death. The Powers of Attorney allow you to elect someone to act as your agent in the event you are unable to make health care or financial decisions on your own. This has become an increasing issue for college students as parents wish to ensure that in an emergency they have access to the necessary medical information. Unfortunately, payment of tuition does not entitle a parent to information regarding a child’s health once the child reaches eighteen. In 1996, the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) became effective and compliance with the HIPAA “Privacy Rule” came into effect in 2003. As a result of HIPAA privacy regulations, children who are legal adults should have Powers of Attorney in place so as to allow parents to obtain medical information or make medical decisions if the adult child is unable to do so for him or herself.

Powers of Attorney forms are statutorily driven whereby states often provide guidance on language to incorporate or even provide a sample form. While the statutory forms are often easily accessible, if they are not properly executed, they are deemed invalid. Therefore, clients are encouraged to work with an attorney to ensure proper execution so that their wishes can be respected. Most states will respect Powers of Attorney from other states. However, when moving to a new state it is recommended that new Powers of Attorney be executed that adhere to the state guidance. In the event of an emergency, it is beneficial to have documents in place with which the health care provider or financial institution is accustomed.

The main purposes for the changes to the Powers of Attorney (both for property and health care) are to make instructions more easily understandable and to expand the protection for the principal (the one designating these powers to a named individual agent). The documents also elevate the standard of care for agents from “due care” to “acting in good faith using due care, competence, and diligence.” In addition, each form includes a revocation of all prior powers of attorney to avoid any confusion regarding an agent’s authority to act in the cases where multiple powers of attorney have been executed.

The new Power of Attorney for Property was drafted to make it easier to read and understand. The “Notice” section at the beginning of the form was changed from all-caps to 14-point font in an effort to encourage principals to read the document. In addition, the new form includes a place for the principal to initial confirming that the principal has read the notice. The power of attorney for property also provides a space for a second witness to attest to the principals signature, which may be required in other states. Lastly, the new power of attorney for property also provides separate notice to the agent which informs the agent’s responsibilities and duties.

The new Power of Attorney for Health Care was also drafted to make it more readable and understandable. Like the power of attorney for property, the notice to the principal is on a separate page and provides a space for the principal to initial to indicate having read the notice. Most important, the new form incorporates extensive HIPAA language to ensure that an agent will have access to the principal’s health care records to make informed medical decisions. In Illinois, the Power of Attorney for Health Care also includes guidance for an agent regarding the level of life sustaining treatment you wish to receive (if any). The new form describes these options in a different manner than the prior version. Lastly, the new form also allows the agent to direct the disposition of remains. However, to ensure your agent is informed of your particular wishes regarding the disposition of remains, an Appointment of Agent to Control Disposition of Remains should also be prepared, which provides detailed instructions regarding your wish to be cremated or where you would like your body to be buried.

Everyone over the age of eighteen should have Powers of Attorney in place. For those with existing Powers of Attorney, it may be advisable to execute new power of attorney documents using the updated forms. Having your existing estate plan reviewed may be the best decision for you and your loved ones.

As always, please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.

*Contributing writers/editors: Lindsey Paige Markus, Attorneys; Susan Baker and Katia Piciucco, Law Clerks

The New Estate Tax Legislation and What it Means to You

January 20th, 2011

wa-capitalOn Friday, December 17, 2010, President Obama signed the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (the “Act”) into law. For 2011 and 2012, the Act effectively reinstated the estate and generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) taxes and fixed the federal estate tax exemption amount at $5 million per person with a maximum estate tax rate of 35%. The Act also increased the lifetime gift tax exemption from $1 million to $5 million, unifying the gift tax with the Federal estate tax exemption. The provisions of the Act cover 2011 and 2012 only. Thus, they are only temporary and push the fate of the federal estate tax regime to be decided in 2012, a presidential election year.

Historical Perspective:
The modern estate tax dates back to 1916, when a tax rate of 10% was imposed on the portion of estates in excess of $50,000. Since then, rates and exemption amounts fluctuated, eventually reaching a high of 77% from 1941 – 1976 with an exemption of $60,000.

More recently, in 2001, Congress passed the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (“EGTRRA”), commonly known as the “Bush tax cuts”. EGTRRA gradually increased the applicable exclusion amount, lowered the maximum estate tax rate and repealed the estate tax completely for decedents dying in 2010.

2009 and 2010 proved to be critical years in the estate tax regime at the Federal and state levels. Specifically, for residents of Illinois, the estate tax exemption at the state level differed from the estate tax exemption at the federal level. Thus, for many residents of Illinois, this “decoupling” (divergence of the Illinois estate tax exemption and the federal estate tax exemption) may have resulted in $209,124 of Illinois estate tax at the first spouse’s death. On January 13, 2011, SB 2505 was signed into law by Governor Pat Quinn, which fixed the Illinois estate tax exemption at $2 million and effectively “decoupled” the Illinois estate tax exemption from the federal level once again. This new legislation may result in $352,158 of Illinois estate tax at the first spouse’s death. However, the imposition of this tax can be avoided with proper planning. (See “Illinois Decoupling” discussed below).

Similarly, 2010 proved to be a watershed year as the federal estate tax exemption amount was unlimited. As a result, commentators joked that 2010 was a wonderful year to die. However, for many clients who died in 2010, the income tax consequences were severe as decedents were not granted the traditional “step-up in basis” for all assets. Rather, the 2010 regime required beneficiaries to take the decedent’s “carry-over basis”, subject to certain exceptions. As a result, some existing trusts prevented beneficiaries from maximizing the allocation of basis and resulted in tremendous unexpected income taxes.

New Legislation and What it Means to You

Return of the Estate Tax: The new law brings back the federal estate tax with an exemption amount of $5 million per person in 2011 (and the 2012 exemption will be indexed for inflation). In addition, the federal estate tax rate is only 35%, its lowest rate since 1931.

New Rules Regarding Gift Tax: For gifts made after December 31, 2010, the estate and gift tax exemptions will be reunified with a $5 million federal estate tax exemption, a $5 million gift exemption and a $5 million generation skipping transfer (GST) exemption. Furthermore, for transfers made in 2011 and 2012, the gift tax rate and GST tax rate will be 35%. In contrast, in 2009, the federal estate tax exemption was $3.5 million and the lifetime gift exemption was only $1 million. Similarly, in 2009, the gift tax and GST tax rate were significantly higher. Therefore, the Act provides a unique opportunity for creative transfers of wealth across multiple generations.

Options for 2010 Decedents: For decedents who died in 2010, the Act allows those estates the option to either (i) apply the estate tax based on the new $5 million exemption and 35% estate tax maximum rate, with stepped-up basis, or (ii) apply rules under EGTRRA with no estate tax and modified carryover basis rules. Thus, the Executors of estates for decedents who died in 2010 should analyze which option would maximize the transfer of wealth.
Portability: The Act allows for “portability” between spouses of the maximum exclusion after December 31, 2010. Specifically, a surviving spouse is able to elect to take advantage of the unused portion of the federal exemption of his or her predeceased spouse, thereby providing the surviving spouse with a larger exclusion amount. However, the deceased spousal exclusion amount would only be available to the surviving spouse if an election was made on a timely filed estate tax return. However, if the surviving spouse is predeceased by more than one spouse, the exclusion amount available would be limited to the lesser of $5 million or the unused exclusion of the last deceased spouse. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether the tax regime for 2013 and beyond will allow for such portability. Clients are still encouraged to utilize traditional estate planning tools to leverage use of each spouse’s federal exemptions.

Illinois Decoupling: Illinois estate tax law has typically followed the Federal law, with some exception. In 2010, when there was no Federal estate tax, there was also no Illinois estate tax (that may not be the case for residents of other states, or people owning property in other states). However, as previously noted, in 2009 the state and Federal exemptions “decoupled” - the Illinois estate tax exemption had been limited to $2 million per person while the Federal exemption was $3.5 million. As a result, absent proper planning, an Illinois estate tax may have been due on the first spouse to die, even if no Federal estate tax was due. With the recently enacted Illinois legislation, the Illinois estate tax reappears but, as was the case in 2009, with only a $2 million exemption (compared to the Federal exemption of $5 million). We have developed a solution to prevent these types of unintended tax consequences by allowing the executor to make a marital deduction election as to a portion of the credit shelter trust for Illinois purposes only. For example, for decedents who die in 2011, the credit shelter trust would be fully funded with $5 million and qualify for the Federal estate tax exemption amount. The executor then made an election as to assets worth $3 million in the credit shelter trust to qualify for the marital deduction only for Illinois purposes. This allows our clients to maximize the Federal and Illinois exemptions without being subject to either Federal or Illinois estate tax on the death of the first spouse. This “decoupling” requires some documents to be updated to allow for special marital trust planning in Illinois and provides an example of how updating your existing documents may result in $352,158 of estate tax savings.

Call to Action
These recently enacted laws and historical perspective provide tremendous insight on the importance for estate planning documents to have the flexibility to weather the storm of the changing tax regimes. It is critical that you have your documents reviewed to ensure they contain these tools. Similarly, other circumstances may warrant updating your documents – birth of children, grandchildren, marriage, divorce, asset protection concerns for beneficiaries, acquisition of additional assets, or new philanthropic intentions.

I would be happy to review your existing documents in light of the new laws and changes in circumstances. Please contact me to make certain your estate plan accurately reflects your testamentary intentions and incorporates the necessary tools to maximize the transfer of wealth.

Illinois Legislature Has Other Plans - Finding Money in Estate Taxes

January 12th, 2011

On Friday, December 17, 2010, President Obama signed the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (the “Act”) into law. For 2011 and 2012, the Act effectively reinstated the estate and generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) taxes and fixed the exemption amount at $5 million per person with a maximum estate tax rate of 35%.

However, while the Federal estate tax exemption will be $5 million, Illinois lawmakers have other plans. SB2505 proposes the state of Illinois “decouple” from the Federal estate tax exemption and fix the state level exemption at $2 million.

While for many clients working to accumulate wealth, $2 million may sound like a large amount, keep in mind that the value includes all assets you own – including proceeds from life insurance policies owned in your individual name. Therefore, the $2 million term life insurance policy you just purchased may have a $0 cash value during your lifetime, but IS included in your gross estate. Under the new legislation, that policy alone will easily push your estate tax to be “taxable” at the state level.

Under current law, Illinois residents must pay both a Federal estate tax and a separate Illinois estate tax. Traditionally, not much attention was paid to the Illinois estate tax because any estate tax paid to the state of Illinois was subtracted from any Federal estate tax due. In addition, Illinois estate tax exemptions were “coupled” with Federal estate tax exemptions. For example, in 2008 when the Federal estate tax exemption was $2 million, the Illinois estate tax exemption was also $2 million.

In 2009, the Federal estate tax exemption was increased to $3.5 million. However, the Illinois estate tax exemption for 2009 was fixed at $2 million. As a result, for many Illinois decedents, this “decoupling” (divergence of the Illinois estate tax exemption and the Federal estate tax exemption) resulted in $209,124 of Illinois estate tax. It now appears that the Illinois estate tax exemption will again decouple from the Federal level.

We have developed a solution to prevent these unintended tax consequences by allowing the executor to make a marital deduction election as to a portion of the credit shelter trust for Illinois purposes only. Assuming the governor signs the pending bill into law, the credit shelter trust would be fully funded with $5,000,000 and qualify for the Federal estate tax exemption amount. The executor would then make an election as to assets worth $3,000,000 in the credit shelter trust to qualify for the marital deduction only for Illinois purposes. This would allow you to maximize the Federal and Illinois exemptions without being subject to either Federal or Illinois estate tax on the death of the first spouse.

This legislation serves as a reminder of the importance of proper planning and the need to have your existing estate planning documents reviewed.

Great Presentation on Maximizing Intelligence with Dr. Donalee Markus

October 6th, 2010

donalee2Lindsey Markus’ first client AND mom will be speaking at the Professional Women’s Club of Chicago Networking Luncheon on Wednesday, October 13th at the Union League Club of Chicago. Registration for the event begins at 11:30 am and lunch will be from 11:45 am – 1:30 pm.

Dr. Donalee Markus and her “Designs for Strong Minds” associates have been innovators in the critical thinking field, maximizing intelligence for individuals and corporations throughout the US. Her unique exercises uses game-like, content free exercises to filter out emotional influences allowing participants to focus primarily on their skills. During her presentation for the PWCC, Dr. Markus will teach participants how to hold more information, sort and organize information in innovative ways, and collect information from a broader base. These skills then help individuals:
• Enhance their communication skills
• Increase their flexibility and risk taking
• Improve their analytical ability
• Optimize their creativity
• Reduce stress

The Designs for Strong Minds program can be geared towards children, adolescents, professionals, and aging adults. Dr. Markus has been especially successful aiding people who have suffered traumatic head injuries and has even designed a program for NASA. For more information on Dr. Markus and the Designs for Strong Minds program, please visit Designs for Strong Minds.

If you are interested in attending the luncheon to participate in Dr. Markus’ fascinating presentation, please click here to register. The cost is $40 for members, and $55 for non-members.

**Coming soon - Strong Mind Puzzles - iPhone Application and Game by Dr. Donalee Markus**